Lifesaving drugs may be killing health workers

Photo by Paul Joseph Brown / IW

Photo by Paul Joseph Brown / IW

This is an important story that hasn’t been written before.

Carol Smith, a skilled reporter and gifted writer, has documented something that had been rumored for years to be killing medical professionals, proven in peer-reviewed studies, but ignored by government safety regulators.

Spread over most of the front page of today’s Seattle Times, Smith explained in detail that nurses, pharmacists and others who handle chemo drugs have been getting sick, often dying, from cancers caused by the same chemical cocktails these medical professionals concoct and administer to save the lives of others.

Smith showed irrefutable proof that the government, especially OSHA, knew that the life-saving but highly toxic blends – chemicals chemicals specifically created and blended to kill microbes or tumor cells –were harming those who work in cancer clinics everywhere.

I sent Smith’s stories to friends at the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. People within both those agencies had fought diligently, but unsuccessfully to get OSHA off its bureaucratic butt and issue the much-needed safeguards for those handling chemo chemicals.

The reaction of some of those who read the stories was the same:  that Smith and Brown had done a great job, accomplishing something that their scientific studies on the danger from chemo hadn’t accomplished because  this investigative story finally put a human face on this hazard and OSHA’s blatant disregard for public health.

I other reason I suggest you check this out is a personal one. This is an important example of how journalists like Smith and her partner, photographer Paul Joseph Brown, continue doing great work after their newspaper (and mine) the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, was killed a year ago. They are part of a small group from the PI who now work – mostly for free or the smallest of a salaries – for a non-profit news-gathering group called Investigate West.frontpage

IW is one of several investigatory teams that have surfaced around the country, providing a place for unemployed journalists to continue doing important stories that might not get done by the remaining budget-stricken dailies. Most of these organizations are funded by grants from foundations that care about the future of investigative reporting and donations of local supporters.

Teaming with major newspapers like the Seattle Times provides the exposure many of these stories deserve. This type of collaboration can provide quality and important stories to newspaper readers and acclaim to papers that team up with journalists outside their newsrooms. These partnerships may grow. The fact that  Sheri Fink of ProPublica won the Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting this year in collaboration with The New York Times Magazine might motivate reluctant editors to take chance.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I was lucky enough to have Carol as my partner during the PI’s seemingly endless investigation into the hundreds of deaths and thousands of illnesses inflicted upon the people of Libby, Montana from exposure to asbestos from a nearby vermiculite mine owned by W.R. Grace.

Bookmark and Share

Vuvuzelas may permanently deafen thousands and the horrible horns will arrive in U.S. ballparks this week

The man who first created and marketed the painfully noisy vuvuzela horn is now including ear plugs with the plastic noisemakers.  But Neil Van Schalkwyk’s generosity may come too late for thousands whose hearing has already been damaged or destroyed.

vuvuzelaMeanwhile, shipments of thousands of the hearing-annihilating horns are arriving this week at some U.S. ballparks and team stores.

But those planning to blow their hearts out should know about a study published in the South African Medical Journal which predicts Vuvuzela are doing permanent harm to the hearing of players, referees and security forces as well of many of the thousands of spectators crammed into Loftus Versfeld Stadium in Pretoria.

Hearing tests on volunteers done before and after earlier matches have shown measureable hearing losses.  The researchers found the noise in the stadium “reached dangerously high levels,” averaging 131 decibels but up to 144 decibels. At these levels, permanent damage can be done in as little as 15 minutes. The average soccer match runs an hour-and-a-half, they reported.

And remember, there are thousands of people blowing their horns during a match so the potential noise dangers are magnified.

However, if the World Cup playoffs were being held in the U.S., federal safety investigators would probably shut down the games or at least ban the horns because the levels far exceed OSHA’s legal limits for sound which specify that workers can be exposed to a maximum permissible exposure of 90 decibels for an eight-hour work day.6763.GA02

“Noise-induced loss of hearing is an irreversible, (nerve damaging) condition that progresses with exposure,” say  audiologists and other safety specialists from the National Institute for Occupational Safety The NIOSH experts explain that this noise-induced loss is caused by damage to nerve cells of the inner ear (cochlea) and, unlike some conductive hearing disorders, cannot be treated medically.
So to be safe. bring you own ear plugs when you head for the baseball game this week.  Fans are already trying to sneak the hearing-killing horns into some ballparks.

I called the Seattle Mariners team stores and was told that they are getting “an increasing number” of questions on whether the horns are in stock and available in Mariners colors.  The answer is no because the stadium bans the use of all horns.

However, The Palm Beach Post reports that the Florida Marlins will be giving out horns similar to vuvuzelas to the first 15,000 fans in attendance at Saturday game against the Rays.

The horns are already being sold on the Web in “any team color” for about $8 each and some Chinese factories are cranking out 20,000 or more a day anticipating that the irritating noisemaker will be sought by baseball, soccer and football zealots worldwide.

Let’s hope they never find their way to a basketball game.

If you want more details on the hearing damage and learn how events such as car races and monster-truck rallies stack up, check out what I wrote for AOL News this morning.


Bookmark and Share

EPA finds the courage to stop corporations from hiding safety data. It could help determine what’s in a nano-dispersant they want to use in the Gulf

EPA must be gulping down its energy drinks in large quantities, because after years of allowing corporations to withhold vital safety information, it screamed “stop” yesterday.

In the Federal Register, the agency said that it will no longer permit the obstruction of safety evaluations by allowing firms to hide behind age-old claims of business secrecy.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, had told Congress earlier this year that the heavily lobbied “confidential business information” protection was keeping the agency’s risk assessors from obtaining vital data on health and safety concerns of chemical substances awaiting approval. Thousands of chemicals were not properly evaluated because of the withheld information, she told lawmakers.

This action has real-life implications.

Photo from Green Earth Technologies

Photo from Green Earth Technologies

Earlier today AOL News published a long story on scientists in the U.S., Canada, South America and elsewhere pleading with the EPA not to approve the use of an oil dispersant that contains unidentified and possibly untested nanoparticles.

The company, Green Earth Technologies, insisting its product is safe for use in the Gulf, says that federal law allows it to conceal information on the composition of the nano-dispersant and precisely what nanoparticles it contains because it’s confidential business information.

That protection may no longer exist, at least within the EPA. Other federal safety agencies such as OSHA and the Food and Drug Administration apparently still allow such corporate obfuscation.

Richard Denison, senior scientist for the Environmental Defense Fund, says he rarely gets to use the words “elegant” and “Federal Register notice” in the same sentence, but that’s how he describes the long-sought-after change in how EPA will handle corporate information.

“Yesterday’s notice is the latest in a series of actions the new leadership at EPA has taken to make good on much-neglected aspect of its mission,” wrote Denison.

In announcing the new policy, EPA said it took the action “to promote public understanding of potential risks by providing understandable, accessible, and complete information on potential chemical risks to the broadest audience possible.”

A careful legal interpretation of the long maligned, but vital Toxic Substance Control Act convinced the agency that it could provide more valuable information to the public by identifying data where information may have been claimed and treated as confidential in the past–but is not, and was not, in fact entitled to confidentiality under TSCA.

EPA says it expects to begin reviews of confidentiality claims — both newly submitted and existing claims on August 25, 2010.

Click here for the entire Federal Register report.

.

Bookmark and Share

Harmful levels of Bisphenol A found in almost all canned foods, new study reports.

The health hazards of bisphenol A are clearly proven, but scientists now report that the levels of the chemical – used to protect canned food from corrosion and bacteria –  are surprisingly high in the  canned goods found on our kitchen shelves.

To reach this conclusion, 50 different cans of food were collected from pantries in 19 states and Ontario and were analyzed at a top food safety lab in San Francisco. BPA was found in 92 percent of the samples according to a 24-page study called “No Silver Lining,” which was released today by the National Workgroup for Safe Markets.

BPA cans report The highest  level of BPA was 1,140 parts per billion – believed  to be the highest ever found in the U.S. It was detected in Del Monte French Style Green Beans from a pantry in Wisconsin, the report said.

Other high scorers included Wal-Mart’s Great Value Green Peas from a store in Kentucky, and Healthy Choice Old Fashioned Chicken Noodle Soup from a pantry in Montana, said researchers from the coalition of more than 17 public and environmental health organizations .

“Our study details potential exposure to BPA from not just one can, but from meals prepared with canned food and drink that an ordinary person might consume over the course of a day,” Mike Schade, a co-author of the study told AOL News.

The unopened cans of fruits, vegetables, beans, soups, tomato products, sodas, and milk were sent to Anresco Laboratories. In order to determine the concentrations of BPA in the food within the can, only the food, not the packaging, was tested.

Hundreds of studies – by both government and academic researchers – have shown that exposure of animals to low doses of BPA has been linked to cancer, abnormal behavior, diabetes and heart disease, infertility, developmental and reproductive harm, obesity, and early puberty, a known risk factor for breast cancer. Also, BPA exposure is particularly of concern for pregnant women, for babies, and for children.

“It takes as little as one serving of canned foods to expose a person to levels of BPA that have been shown to cause harm in laboratory animals.  This is especially troublesome if the person eating the canned foods is pregnant, because fetuses are especially vulnerable to BPA’s effects,” reports  co-author Bobbi Chase Wilding, organizing director of Clean New York, told AOL News.

The researchers warned that in addition to the risk of BPA in canned food, people are also exposed to the chemical composite in common products like polycarbonate water and baby bottles, 5-gallon water coolers, and printer inks, toners and thermal receipt paper (used by most gas stations and supermarkets) where BPA can rub off paper onto hands and get into mouths.

What you pay for the food and where you buy it appears to have no impact on the presence of the contaminant. This study also shows that BPA levels in canned food cannot be predicted by the price of the product, the quality, or relative nutrition value of the product, or where it was purchased.

In related action, Sen. Dianne Feinstein today repeated her demand for a ban on BPA in food and beverage containers. The California Democrat wants the ban included in the Food Safety Modernization Act, a bill moving through the Senate that looks at important external food contaminants like E.coli and salmonella, but not at packaging additives like BPA.

Here is a link to what I wrote today for AOL News.

Bookmark and Share

New USDA rules can prevent tens of thousands of food-poisoning cases

The USDA believes it has the answer to preventing tens of thousands of cases of food poisoning each year.

Photo by salmonella - UK
Photo by salmonella – UK

Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack today announced new and stricter testing standards for use by chicken and turkey farmers to reduce Salmonella and Campylobacter in their flocks.

The Food Safety Inspection Service says after the standards have been in play for two years there will be 39,000 fewer cases of Campylobacter and 26,000 less people who contract Salmonella.

The standards announced today are the first-ever for Campylobacter and revises earlier standards for chicken and turkey. The new standards set a maximum percentage level of poultry samples that can test positive for a given pathogen.
“There is no more important mission at USDA than ensuring the safety of our food,” said Vilsack. “The new standards mark an important step in our efforts to protect consumers by further reducing the incidence of Salmonella and opening a new front in the fight against Campylobacter.”

Today’s standards to slash foodborne pathogens also included a guide on practices to reduce E. coli O157:H7 contamination in cattle.

The new standards ”represent the most significant food-safety development from the U.S. Department of Agriculture in 15 years,” says Caroline Smith DeWaal, Food Safety Director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a nonprofit national health advocacy group.

“These long-awaited changes will push poultry processors to improve the safety of their products,” she says.
The Centers for Disease Control says Campylobacter is the most commonly reported bacterial cause of foodborne infection in the United States.

Most retail chicken is contaminated with the jejuni strain of the pathogen, says the Atlanta-based food illness specialists and that one study reported finding it in 98 percent of retail chicken meat. In addition to the usual unpleasant side effects of food poisoning CDC says it also is linked to Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Bookmark and Share

Heists of meds and costly baby formula soar and feds worry about dangers to consumers.

Some well-organized gangs are showing the sort of criminal skill and chutzpa usually found only on the big screen as they thwart elaborate alarm systems, drop through warehouse roofs and empty shelves.  They aren’t stealing electronics or jewels. These nervy types are making off with millions of dollars worth of prescription drugs, baby formula and over-the-counter medications.

Phto by Pharma

Phto by Pharma

No one knows the precise number of these brazen thefts because shippers of the goods are not required to report the crimes, but experts say the crimes have been increasing every year, especially over the past three years. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration thinks it’s a major issue and has sounded alerts to all players who manufacture, ship, store or sell these regulated items.

It’s not just the cash value of the larceny that’s at issue. Security experts from FDA, insurance investigators and state health departments are worried about the contraband being contaminated by mishandling; or mixed and sold with counterfeit drugs.

“There have been several cases where patients experienced adverse reactions from stolen drugs, reactions that were most likely due to improper storage and handling. We do not want to see this increase in thefts continue,” Michael Chappell,
 FDA’s acting Assistant Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs wrote in a letter to manufacturers, wholesalers and trade associations last week.

He reminded those whose shipments of FDA-regulated items were targeted by the thieves that these crimes threaten the public health because a product that has been taken from the “legitimate supply chain poses potential safety risks to consumers.”

In March alone, FDA reported several major thefts:

  • On March 14, Eli Lilly and Company reported one of the largest known drugs thefts.  Cases of antidepressants and anti-psychotics were stolen from a Lilly distribution center located in Enfield, Conn., when thieves cut through a warehouse roof and rappelled down, deactivated a sophisticated alarm, picked up drugs valued at about $75 million and fled.
  • The day before,  5,000 cases of Mead Johnson Nutrition’s infant formula products were stolen from a truck stop in Richwood, Ky.
  • On March 3,  generic over-the-counter products worth $400,000 were stolen from a truck near Dallas.

It is not just the cargo movers and warehouse that are targeted.

Last year, Orlando, Fla., police busted 21 people for stealing millions of dollars of baby formula – worth $25 to $46 a can – off the shelves of grocery, drug, big-box and discount stores in four counties. What’s worse, according to police statements at the time, the thieves changed the expiration dates on many of the cans before selling them at flea markets and on eBay.FDA_pharma

Some of the stolen loot is intercepted by Customs agents and major U.S. ports, but more frequently nefarious brokers will offer the bogus goods on the internet.

The biggest worry is that these stolen products, once reintroduced into the legitimate supply chain, are often accompanied by counterfeit products or products with improperly extended expiration dates.

It’s a frequent occurrence, says Benjamin England, a former FDA special agent and FDA lawyer, who now runs a consulting group called FDAimports.

He explains how the con is run: “Say I steal 250 bottles of an AIDS drug, but sell 500 bottles into the market, with the additional bottles being counterfeit or relabeled with an extended expiration date,” says England. “The stolen product acts as cover for the counterfeit or expired product.” (England said he saw this quite frequently when he was a federal investigator in Miami.)

Many of the criminal gangs in this line of work have concluded that it’s safer than pushing heroin and cocaine.

For a longer version of this story see what I wrote today for AOLNews.

Bookmark and Share

Rare test to identify actual origins of honey is now done in U.S. and can aid in caching Chinese smugglers

Until recently, anyone needing to confirm that the liquid golden syrup they had bought from overseas brokers was actually honey and not an altered and mislabeled blend from China had to queue up at a couple of very busy analytical labs in Germany.  That included U.S. federal investigators working to identify the origin of the honey to determine whether or not a crime, such as honey laundering, had been committed.

Prof. Vaughn Bryant

Prof. Vaughn Bryant

For the first time, a U.S. lab is able to conduct such tests on the golden nectar.

Texas A&M University announced last week that Vaughn Bryant, a palynologist and an anthropology professor, is now the only person in the U.S. doing melissopalynology – the study of pollen in honey that allows identification of its country of origin.

Performing isotopic studies, Bryant says he has examined more than 100 honey samples for importers, exporters, beekeepers and producers with his DNA-based analysis. Many of the samples he analyzed contained labels from other countries when in fact they originated in China. They were reportedly re-routed to avoid tariffs of up to 500 percent.

Some foreign exporters get around the tariff by mixing honey from different sources, others infuse up to 50 percent high fructose corn syrup into the honey.  It is becoming common now for smugglers to use a process called ultra-filtration which removes the pollen and makes it almost impossible for any laboratory to determine its origin.

“The beekeepers of the U.S. have been pleading with the Food and Drug Administration to enact stricter guidelines about accurate labeling for honey, but that is a long, slow process,’’ Bryant said. “Meanwhile, I’m trying to help out here and there, but it’s almost impossible to keep up.”

Bookmark and Share

Some major honey dealers finally warn the public of hazards of smuggled Chinese honey

It has been a long time coming, but after years of ignoring or at least downplaying the fact that millions of gallons of honey imported into the U.S. each year are illegal, tainted with animal drugs or diluted with phony sweeteners, four of North America’s prominent honey dealers today warned the public to beware of the bad stuff.

honey dipper“We estimate that millions of pounds of Chinese honey continue to enter the U.S. from countries that do not have commercial honey businesses,” said Jill Clark, vice president for marketing of Dutch Gold Honey, of Lancaster, Penn.

“For example, countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand, the Philippines and Mongolia raise few bees and have no history of producing honey in commercial quantities, yet have recently exported large amounts of honey to the United States,” Clark added. In the same in statement she announced the creation of a website which tells consumers, honey companies, food manufacturers and retailers what actions to take to eliminate illegally imported honey.

The site, called “HonestHoney.com,” is supported by Dutch Gold, Golden Heritage Foods of Hillsboro, Kan., Burleson’s Inc. from Waxahachie, Texas, and Odem International from Rosemere, Ont., one of North America’s largest honey suppliers. The site offers guides for consumers, honey brokers, packers and sellers suggesting ways to avoid the illegal honey.

Although the group said they notified most of the big players in the U.S. honey market of the initiative, no others joined in, which is bit puzzling.

Take Sue Bee, formally known as Sioux Bee Honey, which says it’s the country’s largest supplier of honey – about 40-million pounds each year.  The company did not respond to e-mail messages asking why they chose not to participate.

For more than three years, federal investigators have had hit-or-miss successes trying to intercept boxcar-sized loads of illegally labeled honey coming into ports on both coasts and the Gulf of Mexico. More than a dozen arrests have been made of honey launderers and reportedly “active investigations” are targeting a number of other major players in the international scam.

Almost all have centered on honey actually from China that is intentionally mislabeled to avoid paying stiff import tariffs–and often contaminated with illegal animal antibiotics as well.

Those behind the initiative to alert the public say the illegal sales of honey have cost the U.S. up to $200 million in uncollected import duties in the past two years while continuing to threaten the domestic honey business and the future of America’s beekeepers.

“When honey is imported illegally, no one can be confident of its true source and quality. Some products are not 100 percent honey and have other quality issues,” said Clark.

While many consumers only think about honey as the golden liquid in plastic honey bears, in reality most of the honey imported into the U.S. is delivered in 250-gallon or tanker car-sized loads and ends up as an ingredient in cereals, breads, cookies, crackers, breakfast bars, meats, salad dressings, barbecue sauces, mustards, beverages, ice creams, yogurts and candies.

Investigators say that some of the food processors are prime, often-willing, targets for brokers trying to offload lower-cost, bogus honey.

The group says it hopes all the players will accept the provisions of this pledge:

THE HONEST HONEY PLEDGE
We pledge to protect our customers and consumers, as well as the global reputation of honey products, by ensuring to our utmost ability that honey is ethically sourced in a transparent and traceable manner from known beekeepers and brokers; that honey moves through the supply chain in full accordance with U.S. law and without circumvention of trade duties; that it carries truthful labeling as to its source, has been tested to ensure quality, and has been handled in a safe and secure manner from hive to table. We endeavor to do business with companies that share our concern for food safety and security. We pledge to stand against the collection, processing or sale of adulterated honey or honey that has been obtained in circumvention of U.S. law. We espouse a global standard for high-quality honey that does not allow for adulteration with added syrups or other sweetener extenders, or use of inappropriate additives in honey production. We actively support U.S. beekeepers, including supporting research to help beekeepers maintain the health and high quality of U.S. honey production and to fight colony collapse disorder.

For a longer version of this story, see what I wrote today for AOL News.

Bookmark and Share

An e-nose can smell for itself.

Think about an artificial nose.

I’m not talking about just something to hold your glasses on to your face, but rather a device packed with a carefully woven maze of man-made chemical sensors that can detect and recognize odors.

Dogs up close008Electronic noses – also known as eNoses — have been around for about a decade. They are instruments linked to analytical equipment such as gas chromatographs that would analyze air samples and report the intensity and quantity of an odor without the help of a human nose.

The older versions of the eNose could be trained or calibrated to identify a single specific aroma, such as a rose or skunk scent, and then electronically unleashed to ferret out that particular odor in different surroundings.

It has long been believed that the like or dislike of a specific odor is completely subjective, and can’t be quantified. But a group of Israeli scientists has done just that, according to this month’s Journal of Computational Biology.

The researchers, from Weizmann Institute of Science and the Edith Wolfson Medical Center, wanted to develop a nose that could detect and characterize a wide range of odors and could function as an environmental and safety monitors.

Using a device called a MOSES II eNose, with 16 metal-oxide and quartz sensors, they trained the “nose” to smell like a human or animal can and differentiate the aromas into pleasant and rally unpleasant.

For the purposes of their research, the scientists first asked a group of volunteers to rate a selection of odors on a scale from 1 to 30, ranging from “the worst odor you ever smelled’’ to very bad, bad, OK, good, very good to the ‘’best odor you have ever smelled.’’

Those findings were then structured as an algorithm and programmed into the eNose. Once completed and tested, the researchers exposed the device to more than five dozen “new’’ odors and tasked it to determine whether the scents were pleasant or not. The sensors triggered a unique electrical pattern, somewhat like an odor fingerprint.

In more than 90 percent of the attempts, the e-nose could accurately discriminate between pleasant or unpleasant odors.

Of greater importance, the scientists concluded that the modified eNose was then able to generalize and rate the pleasantness of novel odors it never smelled before.

The research, funded by the European Research Council, also found that in the older techniques, a gas chromatograph could identify the components that comprise an odor. The Israeli eNose could detect the mixture of components that together form an odor.

The researchers said that the use for the abilities of their improved nose would quickly spread to a wide area of environmental monitoring uses but also could have possible medical applications.

Here is a link to the study,

Bookmark and Share

Honey bosses meet in Chicago for secret meeting on how to handle smuggling

The nation’s top honey packers and sellers gathered in a secret meeting today in a Chicago suburb supposedly to figure out what do about the huge amount of smuggled, laundered and potentially contaminated honey gushing on to the U.S. Market.

National Honey Board

National Honey Board

“The objective of the meeting will be a frank discussion of issues affecting the domestic honey industry, primarily transshipment of foreign honey and adulteration of honey,” said a note to all participants from the National Honey Packers & Dealers Association.

The meeting comes as federal investigators and the offices of the U.S. attorney in at least four states continue to search for  packing companies, honey brokers and importers allegedly involved in facilitating or purchasing intentionally mislabeled or bogus honey.

The crime, which some major suppliers say may involve 50 percent or more of all imported honey, centers on foreign hucksters and shady importers taking cheap, but abundant Chinese honey, moving it to a country with a reputation for a quality product, changing the country-of-origin on the shipping papers and then marketing the bogus load to brokers in the U.S.

There are two reasons for this illegal global bait-and-switch. First, the U.S. has set a tariff on each pound of Chinese honey brought into the U.S. – higher than any other nation – to protect domestic honey producers from the cheaper Chinese honey flooding the market.

But more importantly, Chinese honey often contains traces of an illegal animal antibiotic called chloramphenicol.  This drug, purchased from India, was first used years ago to stem an epidemic of disease that was laying waste to most of  China’s bee colonies.

The drug still taints most of the Chinese honey, some importers say and the Food and Drug Administration and the Canadian government found the contaminate in imported honey in January.

For the rest of this story, see what I wrote today for AOLNews.com.

Bookmark and Share